s390/bpf:修复 bpf_plt 指针算术 (CVE-2024-35917)
CVE编号
CVE-2024-35917利用情况
暂无补丁情况
N/A披露时间
2024-05-19漏洞描述
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/bpf: Fix bpf_plt pointer arithmetic Kui-Feng Lee reported a crash on s390x triggered by the dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg test [1]: [<0000000000000002>] 0x2 [<00000000009d5cde>] bpf_struct_ops_test_run+0x156/0x250 [<000000000033145a>] __sys_bpf+0xa1a/0xd00 [<00000000003319dc>] __s390x_sys_bpf+0x44/0x50 [<0000000000c4382c>] __do_syscall+0x244/0x300 [<0000000000c59a40>] system_call+0x70/0x98 This is caused by GCC moving memcpy() after assignments in bpf_jit_plt(), resulting in NULL pointers being written instead of the return and the target addresses. Looking at the GCC internals, the reordering is allowed because the alias analysis thinks that the memcpy() destination and the assignments' left-hand-sides are based on different objects: new_plt and bpf_plt_ret/bpf_plt_target respectively, and therefore they cannot alias. This is in turn due to a violation of the C standard: When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the same array object, or one past the last element of the array object ... From the C's perspective, bpf_plt_ret and bpf_plt are distinct objects and cannot be subtracted. In the practical terms, doing so confuses the GCC's alias analysis. The code was written this way in order to let the C side know a few offsets defined in the assembly. While nice, this is by no means necessary. Fix the noncompliance by hardcoding these offsets. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/解决建议
建议您更新当前系统或软件至最新版,完成漏洞的修复。受影响软件情况
# | 类型 | 厂商 | 产品 | 版本 | 影响面 | ||||
1 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
运行在以下环境 | |||||||||
系统 | debian_10 | linux | * | Up to (excluding) 4.19.304-1 | |||||
运行在以下环境 | |||||||||
系统 | debian_11 | linux | * | Up to (excluding) 5.10.216-1 | |||||
运行在以下环境 | |||||||||
系统 | debian_12 | linux | * | Up to (excluding) 6.1.90-1 |
- 攻击路径 N/A
- 攻击复杂度 N/A
- 权限要求 N/A
- 影响范围 N/A
- 用户交互 N/A
- 可用性 N/A
- 保密性 N/A
- 完整性 N/A
CWE-ID | 漏洞类型 |
Exp相关链接

版权声明
本站原创文章转载请注明文章出处及链接,谢谢合作!
评论