posix-clock：修复 pc_clock_settime() 中缺少的 timespec64 检查（CVE-2024-50195）
CVE编号
CVE-2024-50195利用情况
暂无补丁情况
N/A披露时间
2024-11-08漏洞描述
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime() As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling ptp->info->settime64(). As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL, which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid() only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict() in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid. There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(), and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.解决建议
建议您更新当前系统或软件至最新版，完成漏洞的修复。受影响软件情况
| # | 类型 | 厂商 | 产品 | 版本 | 影响面 | ||||
| 1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 运行在以下环境 | |||||||||
| 系统 | debian_12 | linux | * | Up to (excluding) 6.1.115-1 | |||||
- 攻击路径 N/A
- 攻击复杂度 N/A
- 权限要求 N/A
- 影响范围 N/A
- 用户交互 N/A
- 可用性 N/A
- 保密性 N/A
- 完整性 N/A
| CWE-ID | 漏洞类型 |
Exp相关链接
版权声明
本站原创文章转载请注明文章出处及链接，谢谢合作！
评论